ORA contract review, in 30 minutes.
A B2B tool for NZ elder lawyers handling retirement village Occupation Right Agreements. We've extracted, structured, and lawyer-reviewed the standard ORA templates for the top 6 NZ operators. Run any client's specific contract against the standard, get anomaly flags surfaced in seconds, and hand the client a white-labelled summary alongside your legal opinion letter.
Currently in practitioner discovery (Phase 0). First 10 firms get founding pricing locked for 24 months.
The economics of NZ ORA review
typical time per ORA contract review under current manual process. Mostly reading the same operator-standard prose repeatedly.
typical NZ client fee for ORA review. Effective hourly rate compressed by the manual reading burden.
target time per ORA review using our decoder + anomaly flags. Same client fee, 3–4× effective hourly rate.
How it fits in your matter workflow
- 1
Client sends you their specific ORA
Upload the PDF to the tool. We extract the structured terms automatically using the same schema used for the operator's standard template.
- 2
Anomaly flags surface in seconds
Every clause where the client's contract differs from the operator's published standard template is flagged. Includes the diff history — if Ryman's standard template changed in March 2025, the client's contract is compared against the right version.
- 3
You apply judgement on the flags
The tool surfaces deviations; you decide which ones matter for this client. Same legal opinion work you do today — just compressed because you're not reading from scratch.
- 4
Generate white-labelled client deliverable
5–10 page PDF under your firm's branding: clause-by-clause structured summary, anomaly explanations, the 5/10/15-year cost-of-tenure model (financial colour your legal letter typically doesn't carry). Hand it to the client alongside your opinion letter.
Pricing
Two ways to engage depending on your matter volume.
- ✓One-off ORA contract decode
- ✓Anomaly flags vs operator standard template
- ✓Cost-of-tenure scenario for the specific village
- ✓White-labelled client deliverable PDF
- ✓No commitment
Right for firms doing 1–4 ORA reviews per year.
- ✓5 ORA reviews per month
- ✓Side-by-side comparison across multiple ORAs
- ✓Year-over-year diff history
- ✓All deliverables fully white-labelled
- ✓Priority support
Right for firms with active retirement village practice (5+ matters/yr).
What's in the client deliverable
Clause-by-clause structured summary
Every material clause of the ORA categorised: DMF mechanics, capital gain/loss treatment, weekly fee structure + escalation, transfer-to-care, refurbishment liability, termination, cooling-off, security interests, dispute resolution.
Anomaly flags vs operator standard
Each clause compared against the operator's published standard template (as filed with the Companies Office). Deviations highlighted in plain English: "client's contract reduces resident share of capital gain from operator standard 0% to nil" — that kind of thing.
Cost-of-tenure model
5/10/15-year total cost projection given this specific village's terms. Numbers the client (and their family) can actually use. This is the financial colour a legal opinion letter typically doesn't carry.
Risk flag summary
Statutory Supervisor concerns flagged (independent third-party reports), operator financial-health summary, sector benchmarks. One-page snapshot for your file plus the client.
Pilot matter at NZ$0
We're in practitioner discovery (Phase 0). For the first 10 NZ elder law firms, run your next ORA review through the tool at zero cost. We use the feedback to tune the analytical depth + deliverable shape before public launch. Founding pricing locks for 24 months if you continue.